Sales:
415.409.9EYE (9393)
Email:
contact@eyetools.com
Posted by
Greg Edwards
on
February 21 2005
Permalink
|
Comments
(2)
| Client realizes 10x increase in click-throughs after redesigning a homepage guided by three Eyetools mini-studies. | |||
| Test #1 of Existing (old) Page | Test #2 of Prototypes | Test #3 of (new) "Best practices" Page | Launch |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
A PDF of this homepage redesign using Eyetools eyetracking can be found here (4 pages, 905 K, images of a site before/after, plus Eyetools heatmaps).
Guiding a website redesign with Eyetools eyetracking data offers these advantages:
Comments
There appears very little difference between the before and after images. Certainly, the newer revised version is elongated, and there are more pictures, staggered, to draw the visitor down below the fold. It is a study worthy of evaluation and experimentation, though without the eyetracking feedback, it may just be academic. Good stuff.
Very interesting this analysis of how web pages are 'seen'. Something I would like to know is whether the results obtained in studies of web sites in English are similar or different from studies of sites in other languages. I imagine, for example, that languages which read from right to left, Hebrew and Arabic produce different results from English language texts. My interest lies in Italian, and I would be very interested to hear if eyetracking studies of web texts in Italian have been carried out, and if so, whether they are different from the results for English language texts. I also believe that the Italians may view readability in a different way from English language readers. For example, Italian texts do not make wide use of paragraphs or white space. Indeed, I have been told that a text with too much white space is perceived as not being authoritative. Any thoughts you may have on this would be very interesting to hear. Best regards, Alex Roe